Re:This Louisiana Town Runs Largely on Traffic Fines. The Ma...
by uxp8u61q on Thursday November 23, 2023 @02:04PM
(#38396235)
We clearly have different experience on the road.
> Since the speed delta is the same it's far worse with 30 to 45, and regulations reflect that.
If E(v) = mv²/2, then E(v+dv) = m(v+dv)²/2 = mv² + m v dv/2 + m dv²/2. As you can see, the middle term is proportional to v, the initial speed. Kinetic energy does increase more going 90->105 than 30->45.
Maybe this is too abstract, so he're a concrete example. Let's assume a vehicle weighing 1 ton (1000 kg).
* Going 30 km/h => kinetic energy is 34 kJ
* Going 45 km/h => kinetic energy is 78 kJ, so about 43 kJ more
* Going 90 km/h => kinetic energy is 312 kJ
* Going 105 km/h => kinetic energy is 425 kJ, so about 113 kJ more
It's really basic physics.
Re:This Louisiana Town Runs Largely on Traffic Fines. The Ma...
by varjag on Thursday November 23, 2023 @04:27PM
(#38397767)
Then I think you understood that 15 over 30 represents more than a doubling of the energy versus the increase by 1/3 in the (already assuringly lethal for pedestrian) 90 case.
I'm not sure where you are, but from my driving elsewhere, it appears similar in Sweden (only the posted speeds are higher), and worse in Spain & Italy.
And energy is quadratic with respect to velocity. Going 90->105 is worse than 30->45.
Since the speed delta is the same it's far worse with 30 to 45, and regulations reflect that.