Please make your point more explicitly.

You seemed to be mocking the entire idea of "too many ads". I think this kind of law is a pretty strong argument that it's a reasonable idea and not mock-worthy. But you don't seem to think that argument matters, so please, explain yourself more.

So you sarcastically suggest that we can't decide on a reasonable amount of ads.

I supply a counter example, where a nation has collectively decided on a reasonable amount of ads.

And now you're handwaving that away?

Your two comments don't seem to be consistent with one another.