News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on OpenAI's employees were given two explanations for why Sam Altman was fired. Parent comment

Re:OpenAI's employees were given two explanations for why Sa... by mvdtnz on Tuesday November 21, 2023 @12:01AM (#38359511)
No they are not.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:OpenAI's employees were given two explanations for why Sa... by cjbprime on Tuesday November 21, 2023 @12:53AM (#38359899)
(You're probably going to have to get better at answering objections than merely asserting your contradiction of them.)
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:OpenAI's employees were given two explanations for why Sa... by diffeomorphism on Tuesday November 21, 2023 @03:45AM (#38361061)
Nah, calling out completely baseless assertions as just that is fine and a positive contribution to the discussion.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:OpenAI's employees were given two explanations for why Sa... by mirekrusin on Tuesday November 21, 2023 @01:47AM (#38360223)
Intelligence is just optimization over recursive prediction function.

There is nothing special about human intelligence threshold.

It can be surpassed by many different models.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:OpenAI's employees were given two explanations for why Sa... by krisoft on Tuesday November 21, 2023 @03:41AM (#38361033)
Your carefully constructed argument is less than convincing.

Could you at least elaborate what they are “not”? Surelly you are not having a problem with “LLMs predict language”?

[ Parent | on HN ]