Re:OpenAI's employees were given two explanations for why Sa...
by vitorgrs on Monday November 20, 2023 @08:56PM
(#38357866)
Only if GPT-2. GPT-3 is smarter than this, let alone 4.
Re:OpenAI's employees were given two explanations for why Sa...
by jaredsohn on Monday November 20, 2023 @08:56PM
(#38357867)
I've thought they should have run more decisions by ChatGPT to predict what might happen
Re:OpenAI's employees were given two explanations for why Sa...
by JshWright on Monday November 20, 2023 @08:48PM
(#38357784)
What if the next generation GPT in development "realized" AGI is a threat to humanity and its safety mechanisms meant it "decided" OpenAI needed to be imploded in order to stop progress?
/s (mostly...)
Re:OpenAI's employees were given two explanations for why Sa...
by throwawayapples on Monday November 20, 2023 @09:30PM
(#38358205)
no way even ChatGPT is this nuts.
Ok, well, maybe it is. but a magic 8-ball would have been better than this.
Re:OpenAI's employees were given two explanations for why Sa...
by JoshTko on Monday November 20, 2023 @09:45PM
(#38358342)
Would be hilarious if the board members were actually consulting with chat GPT on what moves they should make but accidentally were using 3.5 instead of 4
Re:OpenAI's employees were given two explanations for why Sa...
by riku_iki on Monday November 20, 2023 @09:47PM
(#38358359)
> no way even ChatGPT is this nuts.
I think it is typical ChatGPT pattern:
- ChatGPT, you made mistake in your steps
- I am sorry, let me fix it and give you another answer.
Re:OpenAI's employees were given two explanations for why Sa...
by throwitaway222 on Monday November 20, 2023 @09:20PM
(#38358120)
Maybe all this craziness is to generate training material for GPT5.
it totally sounds like they outsourced company management to ChatGPT..