News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:OpenAI's employees were given two explanations for why Sa... by riku_iki on Monday November 20, 2023 @08:42PM (#38357712)
> If it is the board might be the dumbest people alive.

it totally sounds like they outsourced company management to ChatGPT..

Re:OpenAI's employees were given two explanations for why Sa... by vitorgrs on Monday November 20, 2023 @08:56PM (#38357866)
Only if GPT-2. GPT-3 is smarter than this, let alone 4.
Re:OpenAI's employees were given two explanations for why Sa... by jaredsohn on Monday November 20, 2023 @08:56PM (#38357867)
I've thought they should have run more decisions by ChatGPT to predict what might happen
Re:OpenAI's employees were given two explanations for why Sa... by JshWright on Monday November 20, 2023 @08:48PM (#38357784)
What if the next generation GPT in development "realized" AGI is a threat to humanity and its safety mechanisms meant it "decided" OpenAI needed to be imploded in order to stop progress?

/s (mostly...)

Re:OpenAI's employees were given two explanations for why Sa... by throwawayapples on Monday November 20, 2023 @09:30PM (#38358205)
no way even ChatGPT is this nuts.

Ok, well, maybe it is. but a magic 8-ball would have been better than this.

Re:OpenAI's employees were given two explanations for why Sa... by JoshTko on Monday November 20, 2023 @09:45PM (#38358342)
Would be hilarious if the board members were actually consulting with chat GPT on what moves they should make but accidentally were using 3.5 instead of 4
Re:OpenAI's employees were given two explanations for why Sa... by riku_iki on Monday November 20, 2023 @09:47PM (#38358359)
> no way even ChatGPT is this nuts.

I think it is typical ChatGPT pattern:

- ChatGPT, you made mistake in your steps

- I am sorry, let me fix it and give you another answer.

Re:OpenAI's employees were given two explanations for why Sa... by throwitaway222 on Monday November 20, 2023 @09:20PM (#38358120)
Maybe all this craziness is to generate training material for GPT5.