Re:I disagree with Geoff Hinton regarding "glorified autocom...
by 11235813213455 on Saturday November 18, 2023 @11:35AM
(#38321315)
I still want to read a ChatGPT text that doesn't look stupidly verbose
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:I disagree with Geoff Hinton regarding "glorified autocom...
by chpatrick on Saturday November 18, 2023 @11:37AM
(#38321327)
Why don't you ask it not to be?
Re:I disagree with Geoff Hinton regarding "glorified autocom...
by coffeebeqn on Saturday November 18, 2023 @11:40AM
(#38321360)
The default style really annoys me with its verbosity and overuse of numbered lists. Describing a tone and length of responses and anything else you want - think step by step, first principals, show don’t tell - all work pretty well.
You can even ask it to only reply with a Boolean true or false - which certainly doesn’t play to its strengths
Re:I disagree with Geoff Hinton regarding "glorified autocom...
by satuke on Saturday November 18, 2023 @11:45AM
(#38321416)
Actually, that's a by-product of RLHF. A base model is usually not that verbose.
Re:I disagree with Geoff Hinton regarding "glorified autocom...
by JoshTko on Saturday November 18, 2023 @11:53AM
(#38321532)
Use custom instructions. I use "Answers should be very concise by default. Never provide disclosures. Answers should get to the point immediately." and get super concise answers. If I want more detail I just follow up with can you expand on X.
Re:I disagree with Geoff Hinton regarding "glorified autocom...
by xcv123 on Saturday November 18, 2023 @02:44PM
(#38323565)
Follow up with the prompt "rewrite that so that it doesn't look stupidly verbose" and it will do exactly as requested.
Re:I disagree with Geoff Hinton regarding "glorified autocom...
by WillPostForFood on Saturday November 18, 2023 @04:29PM
(#38324680)
Give this GPT called Briefly a try. Responses come back as bullet point lists.I prefer more verbose, but interesting to see this in contrast.