Re:FCC Is Trying to Stop Discrimination in Broadband Deploym...
by NovemberWhiskey on Friday November 17, 2023 @11:44AM
(#38306046)
Yes, because service standards in government monopolies, like the DMV, are so infinitely superior.
Re:FCC Is Trying to Stop Discrimination in Broadband Deploym...
by banannaise on Friday November 17, 2023 @12:03PM
(#38306354)
The DMV's service standards have improved dramatically in recent years, at least in my state. It's also important to note that the DMV is customer service, not customer acquisition. When compared to customer service from businesses, the DMV looks quite reasonable, and the service is getting better, whereas nearly every customer service experience I get from a business is getting worse.
Re:FCC Is Trying to Stop Discrimination in Broadband Deploym...
by NovemberWhiskey on Friday November 17, 2023 @12:09PM
(#38306446)
Recent experience with the DMV in my state, was that to transfer my license and registration into that state (which is a customer acquisition problem, BTW) required me to book a month ahead of time in their online system, which even then resulted in me having to drive to an office that was the fourth-nearest to my residence.
So "YMMV".
I have literally never experienced anything that even approaches that level of nonsense in the private sector.
Re:FCC Is Trying to Stop Discrimination in Broadband Deploym...
by adgjlsfhk1 on Friday November 17, 2023 @12:35PM
(#38306910)
I take it you've never had a serious illness
Re:FCC Is Trying to Stop Discrimination in Broadband Deploym...
by banannaise on Friday November 17, 2023 @02:09PM
(#38308430)
> (which is a customer acquisition problem, BTW)
No it isn't. You already drive, have a car, and live in the state. What are they acquiring you to? They're just integrating you into their servicing platform. That's customer service.
Re:FCC Is Trying to Stop Discrimination in Broadband Deploym...
by tbrownaw on Friday November 17, 2023 @12:31PM
(#38306853)
> granted natural monopoly status
Eh? The idea of a "natural monopoly" is that even without any meddling or bad behavior there would still only be one company with no competitors. Thety is, it's not granted, it happens on its own.
There's a reason why the USPS is required to deliver more or less everywhere. I admit that their service levels do vary, but I think the aspiration is a good one.
Maybe our broadband infrastructure just shouldn't be owned by for-profit corporations. They've already proven themselves poor stewards of the commons. (Ditto for utility companies, really.)