News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Vehicles with higher, more vertical front ends pose great... by peyton on Tuesday November 14, 2023 @03:09PM (#38268940)
There are places that have torn down highways and deliberately made a hundred million people’s lives so difficult they are compelled to move? In the name of transportation efficiency?
Re:Vehicles with higher, more vertical front ends pose great... by seadan83 on Tuesday November 14, 2023 @04:04PM (#38269734)
Which such places, could you be specific about that?

My understanding is the inverse has happened. Where there are now highways through the middle of cities west of the Mississippi, there used to be homes there.

I'm skeptical that US road engineers did anything other than add roads and lanes to improve vehicle throughput. Examples to the contrary would be very interesting.

Re:Vehicles with higher, more vertical front ends pose great... by jrsj on Tuesday November 14, 2023 @04:18PM (#38269931)
Yeah, I’m skeptical of that claim as well. And if someone tried it on me I’d tell them and their city to go fuck themselves, not move there. I can’t be the only one with that attitude.
Re:Vehicles with higher, more vertical front ends pose great... by novok on Tuesday November 14, 2023 @10:25PM (#38272936)
They are not compelled to move, they are compelled to vote out the politicians who enacted such things and vote in politicians that fix it in their eyes. Why do you never see debates about highway project costs, but in the USA there are a billion of them about transit project costs.