Don’t want to kill all those underground pipes with mineral buildup as things precipitate out as it cools.
The water pumping and maintenance costs are likely going to be their largest ongoing costs, no?
No, the only cost really is the cost of heat exchanger and maybe energy to pump water through the heat exchanger. Heat exchange approaches 100% thermal efficiency with large enough heat exchanger.
Not really, heat pumps as a transfer method can achieve better total efficiency and make distribution of the heat easier.
They’re looking to make cheap use of the existing waste heat, after all, which while ‘low quality’ is high enough quality for district heating already.
https://www.slideshare.net/HelsinginEnergia/innovation-and-s... (slide 21)
They mention they are recovering heat from waste water. Obviously, they aren't pumping waste water into the system but rather use heat exchange to extract energy.
Fresh water makes the entire project much cheaper.