Re:Rise of "forever day" bugs in ICS threatens critical infr...
by wmf on Monday April 09, 2012 @09:15PM
(#3820194)
I've never heard that acronym either; I thought it was called SCADA.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Rise of "forever day" bugs in ICS threatens critical infr...
by Shank on Monday April 09, 2012 @10:48PM
(#3820417)
I think we just have a general problem with acronyms. I skimmed the article at first, and misread "ABB" as "ADB" because I still was going on the premise of it being "Ice Cream Sandwich."
Re:Rise of "forever day" bugs in ICS threatens critical infr...
by raffi on Monday April 09, 2012 @11:01PM
(#3820447)
The unwashed masses say SCADA. Those in the know say Industrial Control Systems. At least that's what I'm told. I'm kind of the unwashed type myself.
Re:Rise of "forever day" bugs in ICS threatens critical infr...
by elithrar on Monday April 09, 2012 @11:11PM
(#3820476)
> The unwashed masses say SCADA. Those in the know say Industrial Control Systems. At least that's what I'm told. I'm kind of the unwashed type myself.
The terms are often interchanged, even if they shouldn't be. "SCADA" (Supervisory Control And Data Acquisition) is your secondary control and historian/logging system, and will often be in control of sending data across comms links and monitoring events. An ICS (Industrial Control System) is your front-line system in charge of controlling your valves, motors and equipment directly.
The roles have become more blurred together, especially as we move towards more general-purpose equipment and IP-based networks.