Re:FCC to propose a minimum 100mbps to qualify as broadband,...
by gnicholas on Wednesday November 01, 2023 @04:56PM
(#38105095)
Are they in geographic region that is more densely populated? Or an area that was built out more recently? In my last house (also in SV) the choices were between Comcast and AT&T copper. The latter went up to 6/1, so was effectively useless. I'm sure it was laid down decades ago.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:FCC to propose a minimum 100mbps to qualify as broadband,...
by vladslav on Wednesday November 01, 2023 @05:17PM
(#38105419)
They are in a densely populated area. The city had issues with internet service for quite a while. The government started to invest heavily in fiber tech around the 2010s, and fast forward to now, almost everyone in the city can get a fiber connection to their home or apartment building. The cost is around ~28$ for 300Mbs and $80 for 1Gbs.
Re:FCC to propose a minimum 100mbps to qualify as broadband,...
by thumbsup-_- on Wednesday November 01, 2023 @05:01PM
(#38105161)
Yes. Providers in India offer far more speed at far cheaper prices than US. The key to this is competition. There are many providers available in each major city which helps consumer. It's sad that in many US' major cities there is usually one or two providers only for a building or neighborhood. My building in SF only has comcast, so they have a monopoly and can charge whatever they want.
Re:FCC to propose a minimum 100mbps to qualify as broadband,...
by Fatnino on Wednesday November 01, 2023 @05:25PM
(#38105539)
Much of residential silicon valley was built very quickly in the 50s
Re:FCC to propose a minimum 100mbps to qualify as broadband,...
by ClumsyPilot on Wednesday November 01, 2023 @05:14PM
(#38105375)
You can find fiber connection in some remote vilage in slovakia.
Consolidation is the cause - US had 2-se as many listed companies 30 yeats ago.
Now US capital is buying up independant businesses across easterm Europe and developing countries, killing competition and the local economy.