Re:FCC to propose a minimum 100mbps to qualify as broadband,...
by teaearlgraycold on Wednesday November 01, 2023 @04:44PM
(#38104901)
I'm in an area with competition and I think I'm paying like $60/month for 10Gbps.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:FCC to propose a minimum 100mbps to qualify as broadband,...
by duffyjp on Wednesday November 01, 2023 @05:04PM
(#38105219)
AT&T finally started offering fiber in my neighborhood this summer while Spectrum raised their minimum tier another $5. Needless to said I've seen a lot of AT&T vans around.
Unlike most folks my experience with fiber has been dreadful but at least I'm not paying out the nose for a connection with less upload speed than phone.
Re:FCC to propose a minimum 100mbps to qualify as broadband,...
by huytersd on Wednesday November 01, 2023 @10:55PM
(#38108445)
I’ve only ever heard good things about fiber. High bandwidth, relatively low cost and next to no outages because they are buried. What’s dreadful about it?
Re:FCC to propose a minimum 100mbps to qualify as broadband,...
by duffyjp on Monday November 06, 2023 @05:08PM
(#38169761)
I always assumed fiber either worked or didn't, but that's not the case. My connection would drop several times a day and be down for around two minutes before the fiber gateway rebooted itself to correct the problem. I had countless service techs out, had the gateway replaced twice, and it still continued. It wasn't until I filed an FCC complaint that AT&T took me seriously and sent out a properly educated network engineer out with special equipment who was able to fix it.
I actually wrote something up about it, though I haven't updated the page since it was fixed. https://duffyjp.github.io/2023/08/02/Log-ATT-Router-Status.h...
Re:FCC to propose a minimum 100mbps to qualify as broadband,...
by gnicholas on Wednesday November 01, 2023 @04:54PM
(#38105060)
Yeah that's Comcast's regular price for their lowest tier (75Mbps) where I am.
Re:FCC to propose a minimum 100mbps to qualify as broadband,...
by huytersd on Wednesday November 01, 2023 @04:47PM
(#38104955)
What? I wasn’t even aware consumer speeds got that high. No caps I hope?
Re:FCC to propose a minimum 100mbps to qualify as broadband,...
by Jiocus on Wednesday November 01, 2023 @05:06PM
(#38105247)
Started seeing consumer 10Gbps back in 2018 (in Sweden). The problem was there wasn't many consumer router devices around back then to support that kind of link. It might have even been unheard of, so one ISP solved it by designing their own custom device to specification - just so they could offer 10Gbps asap.
Re:FCC to propose a minimum 100mbps to qualify as broadband,...
by tracker1 on Wednesday November 01, 2023 @05:20PM
(#38105468)
That would be my problem... my router has 2.5gbps ports, and I've only got 2 devices on my network supporting 10gb (nas and my desktop)... everything else is 1gb or 2.5gb. I'm not sure what the hardware costs would be to support that.
Re:FCC to propose a minimum 100mbps to qualify as broadband,...
by bitbckt on Wednesday November 01, 2023 @05:04PM
(#38105226)
Sonic in the Bay Area offers 10Gb symmetric at that price, no cap. I upgraded from their 1Gb plan to 10Gb with no change in price.
Unfortunately, I’ve since moved to another part of the country, with much less enlightened ISP options.
Re:FCC to propose a minimum 100mbps to qualify as broadband,...
by teaearlgraycold on Wednesday November 01, 2023 @05:22PM
(#38105496)
No caps, no cap :P
I even made my own router because I didn't like the consumer options available: https://danangell.com/blog/posts/10gbps-router-for-fun/
Re:FCC to propose a minimum 100mbps to qualify as broadband,...
by geraldwhen on Thursday November 02, 2023 @05:08AM
(#38110795)
I have 5gbps available at my house, but what would I use it for? Symmetric 1gbps is fine for me.