I ask as here in Australia we eliminated a straight binary [ M | F ] choice on passports 12+ years ago so that people who were neither M nor F no longer had to commit fraud and lie on official state documents:
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2011/sep/15/australian-pas...
https://ihra.org.au/21597/ten-years-of-x-passports-and-no-pr...
You'll note your error in a peer comment where you incorrectly state that humans are either Male OR Female I trust.
It's an unnecessary data point for the purpose of a passport
I mean that's the history of passports, which started out with an indication of the person, but it's a fair question to ask why the hell are there passports anyway.
( * Sure, you could start with limited issue by King Henry V of England in 1414 but that's really getting in the weeds here. )
Of course not. No good person would claim otherwise.
But it does not invalidate those people, to make the claim that humans, as a biological classification, are bipedal.