News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:FCC will vote on plan to remove outdated amateur radio te... by NovemberWhiskey on Saturday October 28, 2023 @04:11PM (#38052981)
>services like winlink and digital messaging are hampered without encryption and become unsafe for the operators

How so?

Re:FCC will vote on plan to remove outdated amateur radio te... by vorpalhex on Saturday October 28, 2023 @04:28PM (#38053083)
Your messages are cleartext, can be forged, and your password can be trivially grabbed across just a few logins.

It's like pre-https internet basically.

This also means winlink shouldn't be used for PII (which is sort of important in an emergency!).

If you can at least key exchange and encrypt between you and the next node, you have some safeguards and your messages aren't in the clear - but that is currently prohibited by the regs.

Re:FCC will vote on plan to remove outdated amateur radio te... by skullone on Saturday October 28, 2023 @04:35PM (#38053132)
I don't think scammers will be listening in on shortwave to grab names or an address during an emergency :p
Re:FCC will vote on plan to remove outdated amateur radio te... by baz00 on Saturday October 28, 2023 @04:39PM (#38053164)
Have you been to a hamfest recently? Do you want half the participants getting your details?
Re:FCC will vote on plan to remove outdated amateur radio te... by piperswe on Saturday October 28, 2023 @11:30PM (#38055619)
If you put your address on your license application, then they have your details if they have your callsign.
Re:FCC will vote on plan to remove outdated amateur radio te... by vorpalhex on Saturday October 28, 2023 @05:03PM (#38053348)
Security through obscurity is no security at all. SDRs that will record everything across a nice swath of frequency are $20.
Re:FCC will vote on plan to remove outdated amateur radio te... by Forgotthepass8 on Saturday October 28, 2023 @05:09PM (#38053402)
+those fantastic websdr sites will have it captured
Re:FCC will vote on plan to remove outdated amateur radio te... by kwk1 on Saturday October 28, 2023 @05:54PM (#38053752)
> Your messages are cleartext, can be forged

Digital signatures are permissible under the current rules and in principle avoid this issue although the software tooling around it isn't there. Similar example: Debian packages are transmitted over HTTP, but this isn't a problem because they are authenticated with GPG.