Re:The Slow Death of Authenticity in an Attention Economy
by passion__desire on Friday October 27, 2023 @12:05PM
(#38040317)
I have few ideas. Why can't people create their own filter bubbles? Lists do that in some sense. How about "For You" tab but for a particular List so that recommendations expand and let me get the feel of that particular List's filter bubble. Why can't I choose to browse Twitter as it appears to a particular category of people e.g. say a mathematician or neuroscientist? Twitter is all public, there is no fear of de-anonymizing anyone if Twitter decides to implement such a feature.
Re:The Slow Death of Authenticity in an Attention Economy
by random3 on Friday October 27, 2023 @05:04PM
(#38043901)
I have a similar line of thinking. However I think it applies generally and that any "broker" (e.g. Amazon) that is not explicitely on your side will be in conflict of interest. The implications are actually deep and wide.
Re:The Slow Death of Authenticity in an Attention Economy
by hightrix on Friday October 27, 2023 @12:13PM
(#38040423)
> There are online communities beyond X
As an aside, I find this phrase funny today. In the past, I would have known you are using the term 'X' to be a generic reference to online communities. Today, I don't know if you are talking specifically about twitter or just a generic online community.
Re:The Slow Death of Authenticity in an Attention Economy
by BiteCode_dev on Friday October 27, 2023 @12:15PM
(#38040448)
People don't seek maximum diversity. People seek the exact diversity of a small sample of the world they tolerate.
The people that say they do are just unaware of all the diversity they reject.
There are online communities beyond X and, event within X you can just choose to track select groups you follow and constantly unfollow what you don't like.