Came here to comment this.
Additionally, Apple has on-firmware-level trackers implemented. So the use case of avoiding governmental oversight is already defeated by deciding to use an Apple device.
So reusing an old Apple device is pointless advice, because they're still linked as contacts in Gotham. And forget newer iPhones, which have GPS always active and already integrated their parts authorization network stack that sends all the identifiers of those parts to Apple's service. Forget Samsung, too, as the Mexican incident showed.
Honestly the article is kind of bad advice all around when it comes to the phone.
What if I buy a used one with cash?
Also can't change the IMEI as grandparent comment already mentioned, which means that the movement profile (aka your flat, your workplace, etc) is still there, everywhere, for governments to see. Can't really disable GSM/GPS module, because it is still active even when your phone is shut off.
[0] https://www.reddit.com/r/samsung/comments/16pgliq/samsung_bl...
[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ln4rsxWq3WM
[2] https://www.silicon.co.uk/mobility/smartphones/mexico-orders...
[3] https://linustechtips.com/topic/1537307-android-phones-disab...
They tried to stop "illegally imported devices" from working, but basically killed/bricked all devices that were sold privately as well as all international phones that were e.g. used by tourists or visa workers. But now the cat is out of the bag, Samsung having a remote administrative toolkit implemented on all of its Galaxy devices (at least). Samsung was not the only vendor that did this, Motorola and ZTE did that, too.
Note that this happened to two parties:
- all people that bought a device outside of Mexico, using it inside of Mexico
- all people that bought a device in Mexico, using it abroad (in the reddit thread case it was a person currently being in Germany)