Re:Text-to-CAD: Risks and Opportunities
by amelius on Friday October 20, 2023 @07:38AM
(#37954821)
The main problem I have with most CAD software is that I can't do:
How are modern approaches solving this (robustness), if at all?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Text-to-CAD: Risks and Opportunities
by ahmetrcagil on Friday October 20, 2023 @08:12AM
(#37955051)
What is the inverse operation of, say, beveling?
Beveling is a lossy operation, so there is no inverse in general.
Re:Text-to-CAD: Risks and Opportunities
by iancmceachern on Saturday October 21, 2023 @02:26AM
(#37964563)
Deleting the bevel
Re:Text-to-CAD: Risks and Opportunities
by abrouwers on Friday October 20, 2023 @08:52AM
(#37955369)
As someone who does CAD work (product design) every day, I'm curious about the use case? Starting with Surfaces (in Creo, at least) can be provide such flexibility.
I don't have a practical usecase, it's just the fact that most CAD software is not mathematically correct that bothers me.
As far as I'm aware, we do not have the math needed to do what you're imagining. CSG requires a lot of numerical methods even for relatively simple operations.
Re:Text-to-CAD: Risks and Opportunities
by iancmceachern on Friday October 20, 2023 @10:41PM
(#37963624)
Solidworks would do this no problem
Re:Text-to-CAD: Risks and Opportunities
by iancmceachern on Saturday October 21, 2023 @02:26AM
(#37964561)
You can even use python or solidworks' own api to do it programmatically