Re:I'm banned for life from advertising on Meta. Because I t...
by bombcar on Thursday October 19, 2023 @08:53AM
(#37942199)
You can put review on a system requiring additional ID/information/escrow payment.
A genuine business will be willing to put down some information and a cash payment for a review; spammers won’t have the time or resources.
You run the risk of a perverse incentive to trigger it for revenue but make the fee refundable or something.
Re:I'm banned for life from advertising on Meta. Because I t...
by SpicyLemonZest on Thursday October 19, 2023 @11:06AM
(#37943900)
Can you? I don't know that I've seen anyone try, but I would expect the PR blowback for "pay us $1 to appeal" to be worse than "you're just not allowed to appeal".
Re:I'm banned for life from advertising on Meta. Because I t...
by johnnyanmac on Thursday October 19, 2023 @12:04PM
(#37944710)
This is b2b, so it probably wouldn't really have that much PR.
Besides, I think for modern society, paying $1 rather than presenting your government ID is an easier ask.
There's a few easy checks to prevent perverse incentives:
1. promise (yeah, an impossible task already) a human will review your appeal
2. if the strike was a false positive, refund that appeal cost.
Re:I'm banned for life from advertising on Meta. Because I t...
by pdimitar on Thursday October 19, 2023 @11:14AM
(#37943998)
This is a solved problem for a long time now: require upfront payment, even if it's just $1.00. Many website owners have reported that this has killed 95% to 99% of all spam they were receiving.
Genuine business wouldn't mind paying their $970 bill by first paying $1 and then paying $969.
Re:I'm banned for life from advertising on Meta. Because I t...
by concordDance on Thursday October 19, 2023 @11:26AM
(#37944204)
me looks at twitter blue bots
Welcome to the world of automation.