"A Young Lady's Illustrated Primer" Simulated by GPT-4

Re:"A Young Lady's Illustrated Primer" Simulated by GPT-4 by bombcar on Tuesday October 17, 2023 @09:48PM (#37923959)

The best sci-fi stories are ones that you could relatively easily translate to fantasy, or even just "normal world" - because it is extremely difficult to write an engaging story that is "only the MacGuffin" - it can be done, but it is quite hard (and often appeals to a particular niche audience).

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:"A Young Lady's Illustrated Primer" Simulated by GPT-4 by JieJie on Tuesday October 17, 2023 @10:35PM (#37924273)

Do you think, perhaps, that the Harry Potter series and its' Horcruxes is an example of a MacGuffin that worked?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:"A Young Lady's Illustrated Primer" Simulated by GPT-4 by hutzlibu on Tuesday October 17, 2023 @11:27PM (#37924526)

Since I read all of the books, but forgot what a Horcrux even is, I don't think so. Because I would not have had forgotten the briefcase in Pulp Fiction. A central element that gets referenced often. I don't know if Harry Potter has a MacGuffin at all, maybe the wands and magic in itself?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:"A Young Lady's Illustrated Primer" Simulated by GPT-4 by bombcar on Tuesday October 17, 2023 @11:53PM (#37924684)

It had a few of them, more or less, but they're all basically just "quest items" and less "pure" MacGuffins- the philosopher's stone in the first book, for example.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:"A Young Lady's Illustrated Primer" Simulated by GPT-4 by yongjik on Wednesday October 18, 2023 @12:02AM (#37924727)

I don't think Horcruxes count - it's introduced way later in the series where we're already very deeply invested in all the characters, and instead of disappearing, it becomes the center of the attention for the rest of the series.

So, in a sense, I'd call it an anti-MacGuffin.

[ Parent | on HN ]