Re:LinkedIn laying off nearly 700, mostly from core engineer...
by hackernewds on Monday October 16, 2023 @12:30PM
(#37902282)
Meddle with the free market? INCONCIEVABLE!
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:LinkedIn laying off nearly 700, mostly from core engineer...
by deviantbit on Monday October 16, 2023 @12:35PM
(#37902376)
A free market is one that is protected. Unfortunately nothing in the USA is protected. Our borders, our jobs, our votes. Those in control only care about themselves.
Re:LinkedIn laying off nearly 700, mostly from core engineer...
by catlover76 on Monday October 16, 2023 @12:50PM
(#37902638)
Economic protectionism is mostly just a form of socialism (save for those sectors where it can be supported by a natsec rationale).
Me and many others are cool with socialism. Are you?
Re:LinkedIn laying off nearly 700, mostly from core engineer...
by deviantbit on Monday October 16, 2023 @01:53PM
(#37903569)
So says the Neo-capitalist.
Re:LinkedIn laying off nearly 700, mostly from core engineer...
by wildrhythms on Monday October 16, 2023 @03:57PM
(#37905563)
Socialism means worker ownership of the means of production; it has nothing to do with 'economic protectionism' by the state.
Re:LinkedIn laying off nearly 700, mostly from core engineer...
by catlover76 on Monday October 16, 2023 @07:37PM
(#37908145)
> Socialism means worker ownership of the means of production
Isn't that trending towards a definition of communism? Socialism could mean a lot of different things; economic protectionism is a market inefficiency designed to champion things like jobs over corporate profits, and was a policy choice made by some socialist governments in the latter 20th century.
Re:LinkedIn laying off nearly 700, mostly from core engineer...
by defrost on Monday October 16, 2023 @07:44PM
(#37908203)
You might want to read up on that.
Socialism is an incredibly broad term in practice, a typical sound bite dictionary definition hints at this:
a political and economic theory of social organization which advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the community as a whole.
So .. community as a whole, not just workers, and not even ownership is required, regulated for the general benefit (minimising polution, requiring power operators to deliver in 99.9% of weather conditions with a fixed cost ceiling) of the commons counts.