I'll take 25 self checkouts please.
Plus the people they hire as cashiers couldn't possibly be slower at their jobs. I'd rather have zero humans involved in my checkouts. They only waste my time.
In the other hand we have businesses like Best Buy which has a "scan and checkout from the app" feature that doesn't work and the employees know nothing about it. I tried to use it in front of them and we followed the steps on the signage and it just orders an item for pickup, which you can't take with you even if you have it in your hand, because they need someone from the back of the store to receive the order and pick it for you...
Meanwhile I can walk into an Apple Store, never make eye contact with any humans if I don't want to, walk to the shelf, scan an item and pay on the spot, and leave without any friction.
Walmart also has that, except the checkout is still at the self-serve checkout terminals, it works great, and it is only available to Walmart+ subscribers.
For checkout you hit the checkout button in the app, verify that the item count it has is correct, scan a QR code at an idle checkout terminal, and then hit the pay button and it charges your on-file card.
I suppose we can hope the technology gets better. But given labor shortages, it's hard not to see a future with more automation and self-service.
Of course, knowing exactly what level of service people are willing to pay for is not an exact science, so the pendulum can swing a bit too far, but I assume the business managers are best positioned to bet on what people are willing to pay before they choose to shop somewhere else.
The original b&m retail game was to keep the big ticket items comparable in price, but to add high margins on the ancellary items like HDMI cables. Now, however, everyone knows the game and things like Prime shipping can get it to you fast enough to avoid impulse buying in a retail store.