Re:USB inventor explains why the connector was not designed ...
by lloeki on Monday October 09, 2023 @09:23AM
(#37820219)
So, not actually USB compliant? (save for the connector)
One can't blame non-compliant cables on USB-C as it could happen with any other connector.
Re:USB inventor explains why the connector was not designed ...
by slikrick on Monday October 09, 2023 @08:50AM
(#37819919)
and that can happen with literally every cable, people have abused USB-A and RJ45 for many decades...
Re:USB inventor explains why the connector was not designed ...
by usrusr on Monday October 09, 2023 @09:11AM
(#37820107)
Not every cable. Not if you make the connector a closed standard that can't be used without ruinous licencing fees and keep a squad of patent attorneys on retainer. Thankfully USB is not one of those.
Re:USB inventor explains why the connector was not designed ...
by lloeki on Monday October 09, 2023 @09:25AM
(#37820241)
> make the connector a closed standard that can't be used without ruinous licencing fees and keep a squad of patent attorneys on retainer
Time has shown that doesn't seem to prevent cheap - and potentially dangerous - knockoffs from areas outside possible litigation.
Re:USB inventor explains why the connector was not designed ...
by extraduder_ire on Wednesday October 11, 2023 @09:58AM
(#37844485)
My APC UPS is connected to my computer with a USB-A to rj45 cable. It is the most cursed cable I own, narrowly beating out the type-A to type-A usb2 cable I needed to buy to get a HTC vive to work. (I later "upgraded" to a type-c cable with A-to-C adapters on either end.)
IIRC, the Ethernet standard means ports should tolerate 5V, but I'm still spooked someone's going to use the cable thinking it's something else.
Counterexample: The Meta Quest link cables use a USB-C style connector but internally are very different from a regular cable.