In Europe: no. Training ML systems doesn't require a license.

In the US: we don't know yet. The law is not clear, and there are lots of suits in progress.

You misunderstand. They copied the literal image from facebooks computers to their own to train with.

And that may be permitted under fair use. It is not yet settled law in the US.

Under what theory would they be granted fair use for commercial use of images illegally acquired from a third party and ultimately jacked from people who they have no business relationship with?

LinkedIn lost a lawsuit over that subject, which effectively nullifies those terms.

Linkedin lost a case questionably decided by a the single most reversed circuit which is binding in only that circuit, which is liable to be decided differently in another, which will provide impetus for the supreme court to take it up. That decision is in fact in the middle of being ripped up. It is the opposite of decided law.

https://www.socialmediatoday.com/news/LinkedIn-Wins-Latest-C...

It's going to be ultimately decided that violating the TOS to scrape after being told not to is legally questionable and furthermore questionable acquisition further any already ridiculous claim to fair use.

> Did they infringe my copyright?

Yes. How are you going to stop them?

Seems like the logical thing would be for some attorney to do the leg work for a class action lawsuit and ask for essentially all of their money given the number of acts of infringement.