News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:HP fails to derail claims that it bricks scanners on prin... by Stevvo on Friday October 06, 2023 @05:56AM (#37788817)
Are phones really better? A scanner has uniform and perfect lighting every time. On a phone there are often issues with glare or shadows.
Re:HP fails to derail claims that it bricks scanners on prin... by chmod775 on Friday October 06, 2023 @06:27AM (#37788936)
Someone is going to "solve" that with AI, if they didn't already.

Yeah it might randomly decide to swap out a few words, sentences, and numbers, but it looks really good!

Re:HP fails to derail claims that it bricks scanners on prin... by justsomehnguy on Friday October 06, 2023 @06:55AM (#37789114)
99% of usage is scanning office documents. Sure, with a flatbed you don't need to bother with perspective correction, but 99% of times it's get scanned, mailed and forgotten forever, so nobody bothers.
Re:HP fails to derail claims that it bricks scanners on prin... by joenot443 on Friday October 06, 2023 @08:23AM (#37789781)
They’re better in the sense that they are in your pocket and take fractions of the time to use.

The app iScanner really does work very well. The glare and shadow issues are trivial to solve with good CV these days, the resulting documents are pretty damn close to a hardware scan.

I had to fill out a bunch of forms when I transferred my car to the US, and everyone along the way seemed perfectly happy with photo scans.

Re:HP fails to derail claims that it bricks scanners on prin... by ornornor on Friday October 06, 2023 @08:43AM (#37790009)
A phone won’t match of course but it comes surprisingly close for “scanning” documents and sending them to your insurer or whoever wants them. It’s able to remove noise, crop to the page edges, and deskew the whole image.