Also a billion or trillion or infinite ants can’t outsmart a single human. So unless some hard cap is enforced (how?) then mini AIs will probably not do anything
Cells are simpler than ants so can trillion or infinite cells outsmart a single human? Why not? How many cells is a single human?
The brain is about 0.1 trillion cells, of which 0.02 trillion cells are the cerebral cortex, which is occasionally consulted by the rest of the brain on matters such as what words to enter into this textarea.
Google can be accounted for? As in "I know the entity that has the data." or "can be held accountable" or "will be held accountable"?
You personally might not be able to exploit open AI fully, but there are lots of countries and orgs that could. Remember millions of dollars is loose change in the defense context.
AI is not powerful. AI doesn't increase information complexity or create new information. It actually does the opposite - it averages out the complexity peaks.
In effect, AI isn't intelligence, it dumbs everything down and reduces information to a common-denominator baseline.
(In the future the real difference between the "haves" and the "have nots" will be those who can understand and deal with information complexity and those who can't. Creating information complexity is the only thing humans are naturally good at, it's our biological imperative.)
I would still rate opportunity gap as higher priority over understanding complexity. its still funny when people try to be digital nomads just to discover geopolitics or time zones
I think neither elite actors like Sam Altman nor the peasants will manage to get their AI to do what they want it to do once the AI becomes knowledgeable enough and good enough at planning to make plans resistant to determined human opposition.
I.e., I think inequality is a distraction from the main problem with frontier AI research.
I fundamentally don’t like the crossbow and guns and second amendment argument. AI isn’t a tool to murder with, having no other function than the death of your neighbor. I feel like it’s more like the “should you be required to license your seeds from a megacorp” type thing. Food is existentially important, and it could be weaponized. But it’s not fundamentally a weapon, it’s fundamentally a thing of utility.