News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Running Stable Diffusion XL 1.0 in 298MB of RAM by amelius on Tuesday October 03, 2023 @11:36AM (#37753296)
Not very environment-friendly, though.
Re:Running Stable Diffusion XL 1.0 in 298MB of RAM by nathanfig on Tuesday October 03, 2023 @11:44AM (#37753408)
2.5A 5V is not much power, and it would use considerably less when idling.
Re:Running Stable Diffusion XL 1.0 in 298MB of RAM by notjtrig on Tuesday October 03, 2023 @12:26PM (#37754068)
125 watt hours for a raspberry pi to generate an image in 10 hours compared to 7 watt hours for a 440W PC to run for 1 minute.
Re:Running Stable Diffusion XL 1.0 in 298MB of RAM by lawlessone on Tuesday October 03, 2023 @12:38PM (#37754211)
Is this for a regular Pi . The OP post is using a Pi Zero 2.

That is big though

Re:Running Stable Diffusion XL 1.0 in 298MB of RAM by agilob on Tuesday October 03, 2023 @11:44AM (#37753424)
Dude, we are literally using single use plastic bottles to store water for a few weeks in them.
Re:Running Stable Diffusion XL 1.0 in 298MB of RAM by dopidopHN on Tuesday October 03, 2023 @12:40PM (#37754242)
[delayed]
Re:Running Stable Diffusion XL 1.0 in 298MB of RAM by amelius on Tuesday October 03, 2023 @12:56PM (#37754502)
We are literally using LED lighting because it saves energy over conventional light bulbs.

And now we're going to put a screen on the wall that we don't even look at 99% of the time?

Re:Running Stable Diffusion XL 1.0 in 298MB of RAM by BHSPitMonkey on Tuesday October 03, 2023 @05:40PM (#37757950)
If we're doing one bad thing already, we may as well do a hundred!
Re:Running Stable Diffusion XL 1.0 in 298MB of RAM by lawlessone on Tuesday October 03, 2023 @11:45AM (#37753440)
Compared to what though?

I think it might be friendlier in some aspects than fetching an image from a server running the big the models.

And you don't have to worry about service disruptions or api keys

An e-ink display doing it should only use energy when refreshes. And you could minimize refreshes to once a day, week, etc

Less friendly than a photo of course.

Re:Running Stable Diffusion XL 1.0 in 298MB of RAM by aftbit on Tuesday October 03, 2023 @12:01PM (#37753672)
Why do you say that? The energy usage of inference? I would guess that the embodied energy of the digital photo frame is probably higher.
Re:Running Stable Diffusion XL 1.0 in 298MB of RAM by numpad0 on Tuesday October 03, 2023 @12:13PM (#37753861)
That's where $1999 color E Ink display comes into play.
Re:Running Stable Diffusion XL 1.0 in 298MB of RAM by lawlessone on Tuesday October 03, 2023 @12:26PM (#37754063)
There are cheaper.. but it might require dithering..
Re:Running Stable Diffusion XL 1.0 in 298MB of RAM by naillo on Tuesday October 03, 2023 @12:37PM (#37754205)
Watch 5 seconds of a tv show with your big tv and you've spent that environmental cost