What data is that? That data on lockdowns suggests that they didn't reduce overall excess mortality: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/hec.4737

>Using an event study approach and data from 43 countries and all U.S. states, we measure changes in excess deaths following the implementation of COVID-19 shelter-in-place (SIP) policies. We do not find that countries or U.S. states that implemented SIP policies earlier had lower excess deaths. We do not observe differences in excess deaths before and after the implementation of SIP policies, even when accounting for pre-SIP COVID-19 death rates.

Causality. The only thing this survey demonstrates is that government orders have weak effects on actual population behavior.

Good thing you're 100% convinced, I'm still looking for the proof

Still you are the one making the exceptional claim, so the burden of proof is on you.

"COVID-19 vaccine-associated mortality in the Southern Hemisphere", a well researched study [0] shows:

This experimental gene therapy has killed 17 million people and had no discernible benefit, according to a very sound study

[0] https://correlation-canada.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/20...

Please don't post this nonsense on HN. This is a joke, right? It's a crank website, not a serious medical journal.

Can you say something constructive about the study instead of insulting the messenger who published it?