Re:26% of the top websites are now blocking GPTBot
by red_trumpet on Wednesday September 27, 2023 @02:06PM
(#37678654)
Regardless of where you stand on the LLM vs Copyright debate, that 3rd party would clearly be violating copyright by selling unlicensed content, though?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:26% of the top websites are now blocking GPTBot
by amelius on Wednesday September 27, 2023 @02:09PM
(#37678708)
How clear is it who owns the copyright?
Re:26% of the top websites are now blocking GPTBot
by johneth on Wednesday September 27, 2023 @02:41PM
(#37679253)
The creator owns the copyright.
Re:26% of the top websites are now blocking GPTBot
by amelius on Wednesday September 27, 2023 @03:29PM
(#37679978)
Yes but if two websites show the same content, how do you prove you're the creator?
Re:26% of the top websites are now blocking GPTBot
by lokar on Wednesday September 27, 2023 @03:56PM
(#37680370)
The legal system has this figured out
Re:26% of the top websites are now blocking GPTBot
by amelius on Thursday September 28, 2023 @10:14AM
(#37689886)
The legal system also figured out that if person A invents X, then person B cannot possibly independently have figured out X, see the patent system.
Re:26% of the top websites are now blocking GPTBot
by drdaeman on Wednesday September 27, 2023 @02:50PM
(#37679415)
If a third party poses themselves as a network operator (basically, acts as a proxy/dumb pipe) or a library (if they have a cache) they aren't liable, are they? I think they aren't because proxy and VPN providers, or CloudFlare's 1.1.1.1, or The Internet Archive are AFAIK not generally considered liable in any sort of infringement.
Re:26% of the top websites are now blocking GPTBot
by rascul on Wednesday September 27, 2023 @05:39PM
(#37681718)
> The Internet Archive are AFAIK not generally considered liable in any sort of infringement.
Wasn't there a case earlier this year that found the Internet Archive liable for copyright infringement?