News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:I got robbed of my first kernel contribution by Aurornis on Wednesday September 27, 2023 @01:00PM (#37677643)
This is much more reasonable than the "paraphrased" reply in the blog post.

I think it's somewhat dishonest that the blog author used the quotation feature in his blog post, but instead of including a quote he made up his own response as if the kernel maintainer said it. I barely noticed this parenthetical above the gigantic block quote:

> He said (paraphrasing):

Anyone reading the blog post too fast would assume the kernel maintainer actually said those dismissive words in the gigantic block quote.

Re:I got robbed of my first kernel contribution by orra on Wednesday September 27, 2023 @01:45PM (#37678296)
Yeah, the paraphrasing here is misleading.

Ironically the topic is intellectual honesty.

Re:I got robbed of my first kernel contribution by sshine on Sunday October 01, 2023 @12:28PM (#37727580)
What's the big deal about misquoting here?

The blog post author just liked his version better. ;-)

Re:I got robbed of my first kernel contribution by tiagod on Wednesday September 27, 2023 @01:51PM (#37678407)
>Anyone reading the blog post too fast would assume the kernel maintainer actually said those dismissive words in the gigantic block quote.

That's my case. I only know it was paraphrased because of this thread. The quote pulled my attention before I could finish the previous line.

Re:I got robbed of my first kernel contribution by avgcorrection on Wednesday September 27, 2023 @04:34PM (#37680892)
Yeah, and I might have felt a bit “blind” if it were not for you guys also having the same experience: I did not see that parenthetical at all, probably both on account of the linebreak right before it and the (as you say) huge blockquote.