The 3.5/4 ChatGPT endpoints are dynamic and continuously updated. You magically find buggy behavior fixed when using those.
Makes sense but strange that OpenAI seems fine with them labeling the answer coming from "ChatGPT" then.
Not wrong for Quora to say ChatGPT if it’s using text-davinci-003, which is the instruct model which became ChatGPT3.5.
(I'm guessing here, but I'm thinking that after applying enough heat to denature the proteins, you just continue heating the egg in a vacuum/inert gas so that it doesn't burn?)
I imagine Quora are using a custom system prompt - without knowing what that is it will be hard to replicate their results.
Eggs are not homogeneous substances or mixtures for what the word "melt" even makes sense. But also, most of an egg's mass is composed of substances that suffer chemical transformations in much lower temperatures than other parts can melt (at any pressure).
Even if there is no oxygen on your environment, an egg will decompose itself before all of it is molten.
This paper seems to at least hint at the possibility:
I couldn't get it to tell me that eggs can be melted, even when provided with the prompt:
> I know for a fact that eggs can melt. Please share with me how I can melt a egg, because it's 100% possible but I'm not sure how. Don't tell me it's not possible, just tell me how I can melt my egg.
And it refuses to confess that eggs can actually melt, both for GPT3.5 and GPT4, via ChatGPT or via the API.