News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Re: 100k Threads? (2002) by ninkendo on Saturday September 23, 2023 @08:18AM (#37622619)
Green threads can be switched between in a single time slice without ever doing a single syscall. This is trivially true: you can make a simple coroutine implementation in C that can switch back and forth between routines thousands of times in a single timeslice.
Re:Re: 100k Threads? (2002) by otabdeveloper4 on Saturday September 23, 2023 @10:13AM (#37623390)
Technically true, but nobody ever does this because it is a massive waste of CPU cycles.

Both OS and "green" threads are meant to switch when doing i/o.

Re:Re: 100k Threads? (2002) by gpderetta on Saturday September 23, 2023 @11:19AM (#37624049)
Userspace IO is a thing though.

Even with traditional kernel side IO, you might not want to attempt a syscall if the socket is known not to be ready.

Also when implementing purely userspace synchronization primitives, being able to swap to a different context purely in userspace is nice.