Re:Mojo: The usability of Python with the performance of C
by moonlion_eth on Friday September 22, 2023 @08:33PM
(#37619531)
Most bottlenecks are IO. "speed" is rarely as important as it's marketed to be. Also rust shared libraries are already there for pretty much every language that you actually need speed
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Mojo: The usability of Python with the performance of C
by mountainriver on Friday September 22, 2023 @09:34PM
(#37619866)
Rust libs aren’t really there for ML, I’ve been down that road and tried them all.
Also reasoning about the borrow checker while doing hard math is a non starter for most people in the field.
Re:Mojo: The usability of Python with the performance of C
by tester756 on Saturday September 23, 2023 @04:02AM
(#37621472)
>Most bottlenecks are IO. "speed" is rarely as important as it's marketed to be.
in "your world", which aint the same for other ppl.
Re:Mojo: The usability of Python with the performance of C
by coldtea on Saturday September 23, 2023 @04:19AM
(#37621540)
>Most bottlenecks are IO
For web apps perhaps. They're not in that domain. In other domains IO is not the problem, CPU is.
>Also rust shared libraries are already there for pretty much every language that you actually need speed
Given that the whole selling point of this is to not have to use two languages, that's kind of irrelevant to this.
Re:Mojo: The usability of Python with the performance of C
by jiofj on Saturday September 23, 2023 @06:23AM
(#37621985)
>For web apps perhaps.
Not even for web apps. You should see how much CPU time a python web app spends doing simple things like filling an html template.
Re:Mojo: The usability of Python with the performance of C
by xigoi on Saturday September 23, 2023 @04:32AM
(#37621593)
I'd like to see you solve certain Project Euler problems in Python.
Re:Mojo: The usability of Python with the performance of C
by EddTheSDET on Saturday September 23, 2023 @06:11AM
(#37621952)
Which ones?
Re:Mojo: The usability of Python with the performance of C
by avgcorrection on Saturday September 23, 2023 @06:03AM
(#37621929)
Found the Ruby on Rails take from 2012.