If I see Miyazaki on a poster, I’m going to be interested. There’s been enough Ghibli without him that I know the studio isn’t magic, it’s him. Not saying the non-Miyazaki stuff is terrible, but certainly not the same quality.
Source: I did just that this past New Year.
What did your itinerary look like?
https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2023-09-05/tokyo-...
Weird, I felt the opposite vibe. When I spent 3 weeks during spring over there, as a tourist, it seemed like there was endless stuff to do, see and enjoy. "Touristy" Japan feels like a theme park in itself. And for "proper" theme things, we only did Ghibli Museum.
Don't forget there's also a Ghibli Museum and you have to book in advance.
Maybe you're thinking of TeamLab Planets in Toyosu. It's a must-see too.
Either way. It wasn't "him". It was "them". Their rivalry drew out their best work.
Everybody knows about Grave of the Fireflies, but a few years ago I discovered the more subdued Only Yesterday and found it impressive. It stirred emotions, a true animated movie for adults.
I also enjoyed Princess Kaguya a lot. The art style alone is very different from Miyazaki's style (which I love, of course).
I don’t think there will be a Ghibli analog to Farscape by Henson Productions - quite different in tone and story but still somehow just a bit similar to The Dark Crystal.
https://cinema.wisc.edu/blog/2016/09/06/when-nausicaä-became...
Seems to cover it.
Certainly Miyazaki has succeeded in keeping the wheels on long enough that there’s a cadre of people out there that have a deep psychological investment in preserving the legacy.
It won’t be Miyazaki’s Ghibli, but it could be something.