News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Adobe will charge “credits” for generative AI by anonylizard on Saturday September 16, 2023 @07:35PM (#37539917)
M2 will be a joke for the AI models of the future.

The actual best image AI, midjourney, is probably a gigantic model under the hood, that takes 8 A100s to run (Aka more than 100GB VRAM). That's why their quality is leaps and bounds above stable diffusion XL, its because the model size simply allows for it.

Model sizes continuously grow to exploit the available hardware to the limit. Midjourney and GPT-4 have both proven that model quality is decisive to success and paying customers, so consumer hardware can never catchup to whatever Nvidia sells to the cloud.

Re:Adobe will charge “credits” for generative AI by l33t7332273 on Saturday September 16, 2023 @08:15PM (#37540196)
How much vram does an a100 have? The M2 ultra has more than 100 GB.
Re:Adobe will charge “credits” for generative AI by AuryGlenz on Saturday September 16, 2023 @08:50PM (#37540395)
I don’t think I’d say Midjourney is “leaps and bounds” above SDXL. It’s better overall, but SDXL closed the gap a significant amount.
Re:Adobe will charge “credits” for generative AI by polygamous_bat on Saturday September 16, 2023 @09:23PM (#37540540)
> The actual best image AI, midjourney, is probably a gigantic model under the hood, that takes 8 A100s to run

Do you have any source for this speculation? In my experience image models are always much smaller than language and even the largest llama will fit in a smaller GPU machine than that.

Re:Adobe will charge “credits” for generative AI by GaggiX on Saturday September 16, 2023 @09:30PM (#37540580)
>The actual best image AI, midjourney, is probably a gigantic model under the hood, that takes 8 A100s to run (Aka more than 100GB VRAM)

Unet are really expensive to run compare to a regular GPT model and they are compute-bound thx to convolution, a reason why no one has trained a unet that comes close to consume 100GB of VRAM during inference. I doubt that MJ is much bigger than SD XL, it's good but not revolutionary.

Re:Adobe will charge “credits” for generative AI by saberience on Sunday September 17, 2023 @02:59AM (#37542261)
Have you tried actually downloading SD and all the various custom models and tools?

For me it kicks the shit out of Midjourney in flexibility and quality. I can make more images of higher quality, faster and cheaper.

Re:Adobe will charge “credits” for generative AI by gmerc on Sunday September 17, 2023 @03:27AM (#37542428)
Midjourney trades flexibility for consistent quality and consumer accessibility.

An optimized XL model in the hands of an expert beats it, handily.

And Adobe sells to experts, not consumers for the most part.

Re:Adobe will charge “credits” for generative AI by baz00 on Sunday September 17, 2023 @04:41AM (#37542869)
I suspect that the energy cost will be the limiting factor here. Which will constrain models eventually.