American bully XL dogs to be banned, Sunak says

Re:American bully XL dogs to be banned, Sunak says by fakedang on Friday September 15, 2023 @02:04PM (#37526915)

Just like a human or a family of humans destined to be and wired like killers and assassin's (a la the Hashashin), so too are dogs, if not more. Pitbulls are way too aggressive to be kept as ordinary pets and I don't mind if they're wiped out of existence by eradicating their breeding. Fuck pitbulls, except for that Red One which raps.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:American bully XL dogs to be banned, Sunak says by brianjking on Friday September 15, 2023 @02:06PM (#37526946)

There's 0 evidence that a pitbull is any more dangerous due to being a pit bull.

Get outta here.

https://www.perplexity.ai/search/Is-there-statistical-43tHi....

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:American bully XL dogs to be banned, Sunak says by bitcharmer on Friday September 15, 2023 @02:09PM (#37526993)

I just gave you a whole tonne in a different thread but I'm starting to suspect no amount of evidence will satisfy you.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:American bully XL dogs to be banned, Sunak says by brianjking on Friday September 15, 2023 @02:18PM (#37527121)

None of them show that because the dog is a X breed that this is what caused this to occur. They're just spinning your narrative that if we just ban X more breeds than people will be safe.

Of course having a large breed dog is more likely to be able to cause fatal injury to an infant because infants are small and large breeds are...large. So is a horse, does that mean we should ban all horses? No. It means that we should take appropriate safety precautions to keep infants and babies away from each other.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:American bully XL dogs to be banned, Sunak says by local_person on Friday September 15, 2023 @02:45PM (#37527513)

Yes, that's what separates an opinion for a belief. You don't argue online to satisfy the other person, anyway - you do it for the silent 3rd party

[ Parent | on HN ]