This, I really saw nothing there that I would not have done, if I had the money to pay for damages. The floor caving, losing a rack, causing a surge, etc, are small risks comparing to that he was trying to save, and to what he was trying to prove to his team. The only thing that would not be tolerable was having someone die in the process, but then he went under the floor himself. I respect that and really I think the article seems to be written by someone in infra that wants to protect some form of status quo?