Not a single protest in the history of the redemocratization (1988) had a protest that destroyed the buildings from the three powers.
And don't accuse me of "spreading misinformation". I simply do not agree with you. You're not on brazilian social media. Either reply to me with respect or don't reply to me at all.
"[...]designed to justify the judiciary dictatorship we're currently living under."
That's literally the fake news spread in far-right media, which seems you are consuming too much. Just because you don't agree with a decision done by the Supreme Court on Brazil (STF) doesn't mean it's a dictatorship.
If you feel I caused any damage to you by point facts in your commentaries, you have the right to sue me, and I will have all the instances of defense garantee by our constitution :)
> I will have all the instances of defense garantee by our constitution :)
What a joke. There is no constitution in this country. There's only the judge-king's whims. Whatever he writes on his paper is law. If I were to sue you, I'd succeed only in getting myself persecuted. So I'll flag your posts and stop responding to you. Goodbye.
> There is no constitution in this country.
There is and was promulgated in 1988.[0]
> The supreme court has been grabbing power for years now and last year during the elections they committed blatantly unconstitutional acts in defense of their candidate including censorship the likes of which haven't been seen in this country since the military dictatorship.
The TSE, the court you are referring to alongside with social medias, removed around three hundreds posts containing fake news, that so small that yet 79% Brazilians had contact with fake news[1], how is that a dictatorship?
You are downplaying the dictatorship that happened in 1964 on Brazil. People were exiled/killed, ALL media were censored. I beg anyone who wants to know more about the coup of 64 read the wikipedia page is a good start on the subject, you will see how horrible and bloody it was. Link: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_dictatorship_in_Bra...
These references are in Brazilian Portuguese language, I'm sorry for it.
[0] https://pt.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constitui%C3%A7%C3%A3o_brasi...
[1] https://www.terra.com.br/byte/tse-nao-conseguiu-barrar-fake-...
Many a coup started with the people believing in lies.
In fact, that's usually what happened historically.
I believe it was actually an attempt to do this:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2015%E2%80%932016_protests_in_...
I think it's likely that the government took advantage of this context to create the perfect pretext for everything they're doing right now. There's a parliamentary investigation into the truth of these riots, latest news I have of that was that the security camera footage of that day had been mysteriously lost. I bet the CIA still has copies though. The footage was requested early this year, government stalled as much as it could but then Lula made some anti-Ukraine comments and soon after images of his people being friendly with the protesters mysteriously made its way to the CNN. I wouldn't be surprised if US agencies like the CIA were responsible for that.
The images that could prove either your “theory” or that Bolsonaro tried to, with Delgatti hacker know for the operation “Spoofing”, in some ways crack the voting machines are lost because of a technical decision done in Bolsonaro's government[0]. Bolsonaro's government is also known for using a law of National Security which a President can decree secrecy for one hundred years for his allies and info that could prove he lies to his followers[1].
Transparency is one of the values described in Brazil's Constitution[2], that the parent still deny btw.
Reference in Brazilian Portuguese, I'm sorry again HN audience:
0. https://www.cnnbrasil.com.br/politica/governo-nao-tem-imagen...
1. https://www.poder360.com.br/governo/relembre-casos-em-que-o-...
2. https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/Constituicao/Constitui...
If only there had been a coup. They're all being punished for attempting one anyway. Might as well have tried, right?