News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Apple finally put USB-C in new iPhone, but limited to 23-... by lazide on Wednesday September 13, 2023 @11:32AM (#37498137)
Take any pictures or video using the built in cameras and you’ll feel how tiny that storage is really fast. Not all of us are still working at 640x480.
Re:Apple finally put USB-C in new iPhone, but limited to 23-... by AnonC on Wednesday September 13, 2023 @12:20PM (#37498731)
Yeah, this hits hard if one is shooting videos in 4K (and why would one not use the highest resolution that’s supported?).

Photos, unless chosen to be shot in RAW and the highest resolution at all times, are comparatively not as big a deal on space used with the HEIC format (choose High Efficiency as the format in the camera settings).

Since most people tend to keep all or most of the photos they ever shot over the years on their phones, it just adds up.

Re:Apple finally put USB-C in new iPhone, but limited to 23-... by lazide on Wednesday September 13, 2023 @02:51PM (#37500206)
It’s true. On the plus side, it’s only a couple hundred gig for multiple hour 4K recordings. The compression is pretty good.

Size/cost/quality wise, that’s so much better than old school VHS/camcorders it makes my head hurt.

Pretty awesome for sure. Still no free lunch though.

Re:Apple finally put USB-C in new iPhone, but limited to 23-... by brokenmachine on Thursday September 14, 2023 @02:26AM (#37505631)
Then how do you transfer those large 4k videos? From reading the comments here I feel weird because I always use USB3 to transfer my videos from my (Android) phone to my PC.

What do iPhone users do to get all that data off their phones and onto their macbooks?

Re:Apple finally put USB-C in new iPhone, but limited to 23-... by basedrum on Thursday September 14, 2023 @07:22AM (#37507477)
Yeah, I keep reading people saying who transfers files by USB these days, nobody needs that speed! Meanwhile, I'm quietly doing that here right now in the corner thinking I'm a weirdo because all these HN people say so. Thanks for the reality check, bubble popped
Re:Apple finally put USB-C in new iPhone, but limited to 23-... by turquoisevar on Thursday September 14, 2023 @08:07AM (#37507827)
It automatically appears on my Mac devices (and iPads for that matter) via iCloud.

Hell, nowadays it does the same for photos and videos taken by my SO if they took the photo/video while I was with them.

Now that I think about it, I’ve got “Optimize Storage” enabled on my devices, so if storage is running low it should keep a lower resolution instead of the original stored locally. But I suppose they must use a FIFO logic, because my most recent stuff is always available locally in full resolution.

If I need the older stuff for a project I click export on it and it’ll download the full resolution, which doesn’t take more than a few seconds because I’ve got 1Gbit fiber connection.

I guess the closest thing that comes to a manual transfer would be AirDrop where it would transfer it via a 5Ghz ad-hoc WiFi connection (or via LAN if the extra hop via the router would be faster with an ethernet connected Mac in the olden days).

In practice it reaches about 1Gbps, but I rarely to use it because by the time I need it it’s already synced. I only use it a few times a year when I’ve shot B-roll with the iPhone at my desk and immediately jump into editing.

I haven’t used a cable to transfer data to/from my iPhone in probably more than a decade with the sole exception being when I push out builds from Xcode to the iPhone.