News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:U.S. v. Google by robertlagrant on Tuesday September 12, 2023 @02:12PM (#37485160)
> Regardless, the GP's point stands: we ARE the sum of our inputs

This seems too nonspecific. Influence is graded on a curve: early life experiences and childhood are formative, and the job of parents is to raise their children well. I don't think we should be equating the influence of internet ads with big experiences.

Re:U.S. v. Google by javajosh on Tuesday September 12, 2023 @03:06PM (#37486221)
I agree, but we also shouldn't discount the thousands of little influences that affect us everyday, either. It's a bit like deflecting an asteroid: a big push early on will have the greatest effect, but thousands of little pushes later on will also deflect it. The key quality is the coherence of the impact - if they push in all directions, it may NOT have an impact. Arguably advertising is coherent in that it all seeks to increase your appetite for consumer behavior. And I would argue our parents do that to us, too, with gifts of toys and other trifles.
Re:U.S. v. Google by robertlagrant on Thursday September 14, 2023 @06:17AM (#37507062)
I agree, but I think being aware of that is how we self-determine a bit better. Facebook sucks you in with notifications, and if you notice that you can disable notifications, or (as I did) uninstall the app and just use the website.