News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:U.S. v. Google by javajosh on Tuesday September 12, 2023 @10:08AM (#37481541)
Attention really is hard to control, and most people can't do it. In fact, the only way I've learned to exert real control over attention is by practicing meditation. Regardless, the GP's point stands: we ARE the sum of our inputs.
Re:U.S. v. Google by robertlagrant on Tuesday September 12, 2023 @02:12PM (#37485160)
> Regardless, the GP's point stands: we ARE the sum of our inputs

This seems too nonspecific. Influence is graded on a curve: early life experiences and childhood are formative, and the job of parents is to raise their children well. I don't think we should be equating the influence of internet ads with big experiences.

Re:U.S. v. Google by javajosh on Tuesday September 12, 2023 @03:06PM (#37486221)
I agree, but we also shouldn't discount the thousands of little influences that affect us everyday, either. It's a bit like deflecting an asteroid: a big push early on will have the greatest effect, but thousands of little pushes later on will also deflect it. The key quality is the coherence of the impact - if they push in all directions, it may NOT have an impact. Arguably advertising is coherent in that it all seeks to increase your appetite for consumer behavior. And I would argue our parents do that to us, too, with gifts of toys and other trifles.
Re:U.S. v. Google by robertlagrant on Thursday September 14, 2023 @06:17AM (#37507062)
I agree, but I think being aware of that is how we self-determine a bit better. Facebook sucks you in with notifications, and if you notice that you can disable notifications, or (as I did) uninstall the app and just use the website.