Re:U.K. Abandons, for Now, Legislation That Would Have Banne...
by blowski on Wednesday September 06, 2023 @04:26PM
(#37410810)
I don’t remember seeing this campaign. Are there any links?
Re:U.K. Abandons, for Now, Legislation That Would Have Banne...
by rentnorove on Wednesday September 06, 2023 @06:50PM
(#37412509)
This isn't the same ad as described in the article, but is a government funded Saatchi one from around the same time:
https://www.noplacetohide.org.uk/
> The campaign is funded by the UK Government and has been developed by a steering group of child safety organisations with support from M&C Saatchi.
Re:U.K. Abandons, for Now, Legislation That Would Have Banne...
by pydry on Wednesday September 06, 2023 @07:02PM
(#37412604)
I think that was the website displayed on the adverts.
Re:U.K. Abandons, for Now, Legislation That Would Have Banne...
by _bohm on Wednesday September 06, 2023 @05:55PM
(#37411923)
Some anonymous entity has been putting up posters in my neighborhood decrying Apple for "allowing" CSAM to be stored on iCloud. Very creepy propaganda campaign.
Re:U.K. Abandons, for Now, Legislation That Would Have Banne...
by callalex on Wednesday September 06, 2023 @09:10PM
(#37413536)
Those posters are almost certainly plastered up by someone who genuinely believes in the cause. They have been manipulated by corrupt media, but it is a tactical error to assume that a political party is directly paying for such poster campaigns.
Re:U.K. Abandons, for Now, Legislation That Would Have Banne...
by heavyset_go on Wednesday September 06, 2023 @09:23PM
(#37413620)
It's also guerilla marketing 101, and they wouldn't be the first company, interest group or marketing agency that used those tactics to promote their products, interests, etc.
https://www.techdirt.com/2022/01/19/uk-has-voyeuristic-new-p...
https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-news/revealed-u...
All about saving the children. From everybody except Prince Andrew, it seems.