News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on A JVM in Rust part 5 – Executing instructions. Parent comment

Re:A JVM in Rust part 5 – Executing instructions by bialpio on Monday August 28, 2023 @05:22PM (#37300555)
Yeah, I think I understand why you had to write it this way, but the fact that this lifetime needs to be bubbled up so far up is really non-intuitive to me.

> If there are better ways to do this, I would be really happy to learn, though!

Me, too. :) I find myself limited by my way of thinking here, coming from C++ ("I _know_ it lives long enough, why don't you let me express this?").

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:A JVM in Rust part 5 – Executing instructions by andreabergia on Tuesday August 29, 2023 @02:04AM (#37304005)
Agreed, it _is_ annoying. It bubbles up everywhere and it feels like "something to silence the compiler" more than "something to express the safety of the code", as other people have pointed out.
[ Parent | on HN ]