News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Seagate hits 1 terabit per square inch, 60TB hard drives ... by driverdan on Tuesday March 20, 2012 @08:39AM (#3728895)
Since it requires a pulse from the laser to write does this also mean data will be more durable and less vulnerable to damage from external electromagnetic fields?
Re:Seagate hits 1 terabit per square inch, 60TB hard drives ... by DanBC on Tuesday March 20, 2012 @10:01AM (#3729239)
Have you ever lost data on a hard drive because of external magnetic fields?

For sure, if you get a degausser or other very strong field you will cause damage. But there are two strong magnets inside the case near the platters, so I'm not sure what kind of magnetic field is available in common domestic or office settings that might be harmful.

Re:Seagate hits 1 terabit per square inch, 60TB hard drives ... by mikeash on Tuesday March 20, 2012 @02:02PM (#3730605)
Magnetic field strength follows an inverse cube law, so an external magnet would have to be incredibly strong to alter data.
Re:Seagate hits 1 terabit per square inch, 60TB hard drives ... by ars on Tuesday March 20, 2012 @04:30PM (#3731360)
Magnetic field strength does not follow any specific dropoff law because it's a dipole.

The dropoff depends on how far apart the ends of the poles are. (i.e. from a distance the two poles blend together and average to zero), it also depends on the orientation - are the poles parallel or perpendicular?

Re:Seagate hits 1 terabit per square inch, 60TB hard drives ... by mikeash on Tuesday March 20, 2012 @04:35PM (#3731396)
True, but for the common case where the distance from the magnet is substantially greater than the distance between the poles, inverse cube is plenty good enough as an approximation.
Re:Seagate hits 1 terabit per square inch, 60TB hard drives ... by mrsebastian on Tuesday March 20, 2012 @08:44AM (#3728913)
Yep, possibly. It might make it more resistant to EM interference from the sun, or something, but not from a huge electromagnet.
Re:Seagate hits 1 terabit per square inch, 60TB hard drives ... by wmf on Tuesday March 20, 2012 @09:31AM (#3729081)
Each bit will be smaller, so maybe they will be more vulnerable.