News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:AI Real-Time Human Full-Body Photo Generator by basch on Wednesday August 23, 2023 @12:50PM (#37238823)
A copyright is a government granted monopoly. The copyright office has stated they wont grant monopoly privilege for ai generated art. The courts thus far have backed them up.

I would say it doesnt look good at the moment for to try and enforce ownership of something ai generated, it would be an uphill battle, and the default/null position would be that the art is free to use, and unprotected by government.

Re:AI Real-Time Human Full-Body Photo Generator by dragonwriter on Wednesday August 23, 2023 @02:26PM (#37240186)
> The copyright office has stated they wont grant monopoly privilege for ai generated art.

No, they haven't.

They've said that if the only human input is a text prompt, then it lacks the required human creativity to be eligible for copyright protection.

Re:AI Real-Time Human Full-Body Photo Generator by tomcam on Wednesday August 23, 2023 @03:24PM (#37240951)
Not trying to be combative, but I don't see the difference?
Re:AI Real-Time Human Full-Body Photo Generator by dragonwriter on Wednesday August 23, 2023 @03:47PM (#37241196)
Real AI imagegen workflows very often have more input from the human creating the image than a text prompt.
Re:AI Real-Time Human Full-Body Photo Generator by basch on Wednesday August 23, 2023 @04:51PM (#37241702)
seems a little circular semantically. if it has significant human input its human generated moreso than ai generated, in which case we are saying the same thing.
Re:AI Real-Time Human Full-Body Photo Generator by tomcam on Wednesday August 23, 2023 @10:22PM (#37244336)
Textures, sample images, something like that?
Re:AI Real-Time Human Full-Body Photo Generator by Philpax on Thursday August 24, 2023 @04:10AM (#37246251)
ControlNet offers a wide variety of additional input sources: https://stable-diffusion-art.com/controlnet/#Preprocessors_a...