News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:G. Polya, How to Solve It by paulpauper on Tuesday August 22, 2023 @08:41PM (#37230491)
if the techniques were any good polya would have applied them himself to solving problems, and maybe his Wikipedia entry would instead be about the things he proves and solved and less about the book, as it's said "those who can, do, those who can't teach". he was a middling mathematician who wrote a famous book. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_P%C3%B3lya
Re:G. Polya, How to Solve It by bollu on Tuesday August 22, 2023 @09:07PM (#37230671)
Surely you’re joking. Polya pioneered so much combinatorics I don’t even know where to begin. Heck, a lot of counting problems reduces to polya’s enumeration theorem. The page of “references” to stuff named after him should be a clue to you.
Re:G. Polya, How to Solve It by OldGuyInTheClub on Tuesday August 22, 2023 @10:04PM (#37231029)
Definitely. Whatever one may think of "How to Solve It," Polya was a renowned mathematician. The book is like the Richard Hamming lectures that often come up on HN: Great thoughts from a great mind but not easily applied by the average or even above average Joe.
Re:G. Polya, How to Solve It by boppo1 on Tuesday August 22, 2023 @10:12PM (#37231098)
Richard hamming lectures? I'd google, but I wouldn't know if I'd found the ones you meant.
Re:G. Polya, How to Solve It by OldGuyInTheClub on Tuesday August 22, 2023 @10:22PM (#37231167)
Re:G. Polya, How to Solve It by lporto on Wednesday August 23, 2023 @04:12AM (#37233160)
Re:G. Polya, How to Solve It by freilanzer on Wednesday August 23, 2023 @05:10AM (#37233517)
But besides combinatorics, what has he done for us lately? ;)
Re:G. Polya, How to Solve It by fuzztester on Wednesday August 23, 2023 @06:39AM (#37233992)
>lately

Luckily for the world, he dodged the 'startup craze' bullet ;) - by living before it started up :)

Re:G. Polya, How to Solve It by mathisfun123 on Tuesday August 22, 2023 @10:59PM (#37231369)
Every so often there's a comment on here that's simultaneously so ignorant and so arrogant that it crosses from offensive to hilarious. Congrats, this one is up there with the likes of "it could just be rsync".
Re:G. Polya, How to Solve It by jodrellblank on Wednesday August 23, 2023 @12:03AM (#37231726)
Not knowing what a mathematician born in 1887 did is "so ignorant and so arrogant it's beyond offensive"? Are you ... insane?
Re:G. Polya, How to Solve It by mathisfun123 on Wednesday August 23, 2023 @12:05AM (#37231740)
the guy clearly says

>but Wikipedia does not show anything else

go look at the wikipedia page for george polya and tell me what state of mind you need to be in to conclude that he didn't accomplish anything outside of publishing that book.

also btw

>born in 1887

he lived very long and had a very long career so you're still right

>Died September 7, 1985 (aged 97)

Re:G. Polya, How to Solve It by jodrellblank on Wednesday August 23, 2023 @07:27AM (#37234268)
The guy misread a Wikipedia page and you're "beyond offended" and call that "arrogant"?

> "so you're still not close"

I'm "still" not close? Still not close ... to what?

Re:G. Polya, How to Solve It by mathisfun123 on Wednesday August 23, 2023 @08:46AM (#37234982)
> "beyond offended"

Who exactly are you quoting here? My comment doesn't contain that phrase.

> The guy misread a Wikipedia page

I don't know how it's possible to "misread" a wiki that's all of 500 words and has things like this:

> He made fundamental contributions to combinatorics, number theory, numerical analysis and probability theory.

> There are three prizes named after Pólya,

> Stanford University has a Polya Hall named in his honor.

Except in so far as he was temporarily blinded by arrogance.

> I'm "still" not close? Still not close ... to what?

Still not close to any semblance of a convincing rebuke.

Re:G. Polya, How to Solve It by jodrellblank on Wednesday August 23, 2023 @10:05AM (#37236108)
I am not exactly quoting anyone. So now that's settled, you can't use that as a dodge to get out of responding to the point.

> "I don't know how it's possible to "misread" a wiki"

Great, thanks for your informative contributions. Don't forget to be offended and accuse someone of ignorance and arrogance just because you don't understand. That's useful.

> "Still not close to any semblance of a convincing rebuke"

His death was still so long ago that more than half the population of Earth wasn't even born at the time.

Re:G. Polya, How to Solve It by mathisfun123 on Wednesday August 23, 2023 @10:09AM (#37236160)
> I am not exactly quoting anyone.

conventionally (but you're free to diverge of course) double quotes, like in

> "beyond offended"

are for quoting someone/something.

Re:G. Polya, How to Solve It by jodrellblank on Wednesday August 23, 2023 @02:32PM (#37240269)
I'm being unconventional. So now that's settled, you can't use that as a dodge to get out of responding to the point.