"It can couch its descriptions in the language of [its primary audience]." This is a weird critique.
Re:When Trucks Fly
by shockeychap on Tuesday August 22, 2023 @06:46PM
(#37229587)
That's fair to say, and I don't deny being a little hostile toward snobbery and pretension. I always have been. However, I also don't think [its primary audience] is quite right. I think [its primary audience's self image] is a little more correct.
Yes it's a total myth that more readers of The New Yorker would know "wine people care about soil" than know "monster truck people care about dirt."
>But I do find it off-putting and pretentious.
If you let someone make you feel guilty about the things you like, then there's a bit of self reflecting that should be done.
> the language of coastal elites
For someone wanting plain language, it's surprising that you say "New York Jews" this way.
Re:When Trucks Fly
by AlbertCory on Tuesday August 22, 2023 @09:42PM
(#37230875)
ctrl-f "jew" no hits.
Re:When Trucks Fly
by zoklet-enjoyer on Tuesday August 22, 2023 @09:55PM
(#37230970)
I don't think of New York specifically or Jews at all when I see the term "coastal elites."
I think of wealthy business owners on the east and west coasts. Venture capitalists. Managers at software companies. Politicians. Just high paid and/or influential people who think highly of themselves and others in their cliques.
Re:When Trucks Fly
by OfSanguineFire on Wednesday August 23, 2023 @03:24AM
(#37232830)
The New Yorker was founded to reflect a WASPy perspective, its celebrated founder was of rather humble background and chased that. And how many Jews, historically, were among the American elites playing polo? Your comment is well out of order.
The article never made reference to "inbred yokels". It didn't have to. It can couch its descriptions in the language of coastal elites who supposedly know more of wine and polo than they do of simple things like truck rallies. And while it's ostensibly explaining how "sophisticated" the sport is, the readers will fully understand the "isn't just brainless amusement for inbred yokels" part.
I wouldn't characterize my response as one of outrage. But I do find it off-putting and pretentious.