Fair enough on all points - I did somehow miss multiple times that the article explicitly makes claim #3 in the first sentence (was skipping straight to the data probably), which I think is dumb for the reasons you mentioned, but also does vindicate Guvante's claims as being from the article.

And yes, I should have used the quote about units in responding to the claim about units, think I was focused on their original claim of 74% of units which was the property number so used the property number. FWIW, I did point out the idiotic definition of institutional investor (ie. including trustees) in another comment.