Re:'No-water' hydropower turns England's hills into green an...
by ragebol on Saturday August 19, 2023 @02:16PM
(#37191533)
The equation for potential energy is U = m ⋅ g ⋅ h, so higher density factors into higher mass (per unit volume) so directly into higher energy storage capacity.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:'No-water' hydropower turns England's hills into green an...
by jjk166 on Saturday August 19, 2023 @02:40PM
(#37191748)
Which generates more energy, dropping 1000 tons of water 100 meters, or dropping 1000 tons of steel 100 meters?
Re:'No-water' hydropower turns England's hills into green an...
by nine_k on Saturday August 19, 2023 @02:50PM
(#37191841)
Storage tanks are limited by volume, not mass.
Re:'No-water' hydropower turns England's hills into green an...
by jjk166 on Saturday August 19, 2023 @03:50PM
(#37192429)
Which falls under the category of component sizing. But assuming you have however much mass at a given height, a denser fluid won't let you extract the same amount of energy from a lower height, which is what the company is claiming.
Re:'No-water' hydropower turns England's hills into green an...
by hdjfkfbfbr on Saturday August 19, 2023 @09:02PM
(#37194977)
There is also craned power generation BTW.. Concrete blocks are stacked with a crane.. They are then dropped to the ground and the potential energy harvested by the cranes motor
Re:'No-water' hydropower turns England's hills into green an...
by fnordpiglet on Saturday August 19, 2023 @02:21PM
(#37191579)
But as they stated it translates into higher energy storage capacity (per unit volume). This translates into smaller footprints as volumes go down, but that’s it. Now, mercury is almost 14 times more dense than water so that’s nothing to sneeze at.