Thirteen years later, why are most administrators still from 2005?

Re:Thirteen years later, why are most administrators still f... by flangola7 on Thursday August 17, 2023 @03:08AM (#37158234)

That cofounder had some... not impressive takes

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Thirteen years later, why are most administrators still f... by notrono on Thursday August 17, 2023 @04:22AM (#37158705)

How so? Seems pretty insightful to me.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Thirteen years later, why are most administrators still f... by SanjayMehta on Thursday August 17, 2023 @10:52PM (#37170932)

I’m curious to know too, but not only is there no response, my original comment seems have been downvoted into relative oblivion.

The last time I commented on WP, the same thing happened. Interesting.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Thirteen years later, why are most administrators still f... by Snowflame on Saturday August 19, 2023 @01:12AM (#37185733)

This is because Larry Sanger is crazy. There are legitimate criticisms of Wikipedia to be made, but citing them to Sanger makes them weaker not stronger.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Thirteen years later, why are most administrators still f... by SanjayMehta on Saturday August 19, 2023 @04:16AM (#37186669)

Calling Sanger “crazy” is not helpful.

The same tag could be applied to almost anyone creative from Tesla to Picasso to Musk.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Thirteen years later, why are most administrators still f... by notrono on Saturday August 19, 2023 @07:06AM (#37187530)

Do you have anything more enlightening than "Larry Sanger is crazy"? It's not a particularly substantive critique.

[ Parent | on HN ]