Re:Seattle becomes first in U.S. to protect gig workers from...
by thegrimmest on Wednesday August 09, 2023 @09:51PM
(#37070938)
You can be left exactly as high and as dry as the contract you signed stipulates, and if you have a dispute we have a pretty good system to work that out.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Seattle becomes first in U.S. to protect gig workers from...
by Dylan16807 on Wednesday August 09, 2023 @10:00PM
(#37071014)
Fair contracts need negotiating power on both sides.
Re:Seattle becomes first in U.S. to protect gig workers from...
by themitigating on Thursday August 10, 2023 @01:36AM
(#37072359)
Equal negotiating power
Re:Seattle becomes first in U.S. to protect gig workers from...
by brigandish on Thursday August 10, 2023 @08:41PM
(#37083657)
Iām not sure about equal as life can be messy (you have a cash flow problem and need to sell now, the buyer knows that - can that be equal?) but certainly fair should be a good start.
Re:Seattle becomes first in U.S. to protect gig workers from...
by harimau777 on Wednesday August 09, 2023 @10:59PM
(#37071417)
As a practical matter, that doesn't work when the power imbalance is so great that one side doesn't have a realistic way to negotiate the contract.
I.e. if the best job that someone can negotiate is one where they are being exploited or abused, then that doesn't make the exploitation/abuse any more just.
Re:Seattle becomes first in U.S. to protect gig workers from...
by nextaccountic on Thursday August 10, 2023 @12:11AM
(#37071851)
The trouble is that most people will become homeless if they don't get a job. As long as there is a steady rate of unemployment, there are people that can't meaningfully decline whatever conditions are in their employment contract.
And that's what this pretty good system doesn't account for: the inherent coercion of a fundamentally unjust system