Re:Supreme Court rules against Epic, so Apple can keep its A...
by vicktour on Wednesday August 09, 2023 @01:55PM
(#37066294)
Not hearing a case is nearly as impactful as hearing one. Its just easier to overturn it in the future if they want to.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Supreme Court rules against Epic, so Apple can keep its A...
by wtallis on Wednesday August 09, 2023 @01:57PM
(#37066316)
I don't think the Supreme Court has refused to hear the case, they've just refused to vacate the stay that is preventing the lower court's ruling from taking effect yet.
Re:Supreme Court rules against Epic, so Apple can keep its A...
by kennywinker on Wednesday August 09, 2023 @01:58PM
(#37066326)
Overturning long standing law doesn’t seem to be a problem for the current supreme court